I agree. The minimum number of posts creates unnecessary comments.
LOL Like this one, or mine, but than again I am way above that requirement. I think the 5 post thing should go away.
Exactly, its getting quite frustrating, and especially the stupid thank you comments in the lesson plan sections that create needless posts to wade through to actually find the materials. I mean its for me a more and more common occurrence for me to read a stupid or needless post and go wt... and then look and see the users post count is at 5....
What annoys me is that some people thank others for the material before they've had the chance to download it. You click on someone's profile and they have 5 posts but 3 of them just say "thanks a lot, this is great!

" That means they were posting thanks before they were able to download. It's the worst kind of filler and, like KingKrang says, you sometimes have to wade through dozens of pre-emptive thanks on the longer threads - often the best - to find actual contributions, updates, improvements etc. I'm all for people expressing gratitude but maybe a PM would be more appropriate and clean up a lot of the site's clutter.
Every time I see someone with the post to download minimum of 5 next to their name and I see the "thanks a lot, this is great!" post, I always think, "You little leech. You couldn't even take the time to reply to 5 different things in the general discussion and now you're cluttering the boards with this crap."
The 5 posts rule has failed because it isn't strictly enforced. People just post 5 "thanks" posts, say what book they're reading and then download all they want - at least saying what book you're reading is some level of contribution.
If you want to force people to contribute before they download then you have to decide what actually constitutes as a contribution. Frankly, I think we should go back to permitting a downloading free for all because, if we don't, we'll soon be past our necks in useless posts.