im curious to know why the people who said no say no
Every forum I've been on that utilizes some sort of rating system ends up allowing [mod edit: removed profanity] posts to kind of hang around at the top like the foam on a beer. On Youtube, if you search a song you're fond of, more than likely the top 'thumbs up' comment is akin to 'thumbs up if you think this song is better than [polarizing pop star]. Typically, negative posts, regardless of maturity level or brevity of comment, get voted down in favor of my previous example. In the end, it creates an awful hive-mind and reduces any level of diversity in posters. Check your facebook wall and notice all the top 'liked' comments; I can almost guarantee that they're all bland, anecdotal, and uninformed opinions that just sound catchy.
Furthermore, it opens up waygook.org to SEO firms who'll game this website for hits and ad revenue to their clients. That's exactly what happened to Digg.com and is currently happening to Reddit.com, both of which use a community 'like/dislike' option for suggesting articles.
I suppose what I'm getting at is, if you simplify the content, you increase the effectiveness of bad posting.
Rather than a like and dislike button, how about a 5 star ranking system (like youtube)?. That way we can identify the outstanding, mediocre, and poor material.
I find this idea better than the like/dislike option, but as the mod stated, it'd require substantial backlog starring. If you implemented it tomorrow, an excellent thread from last month may never get noticed and eventually drop off the map. Sure this may happen now, but with a ranking system you can intentionally drop those posts off.