Jobs!
None of that is as important as not beating the students. Seriously. Most of us didn't grow up in an environment where we were beaten in class regularly by the teacher, principal, or by other students at the will of an adult. Making classroom beating illegal and enforcing it has been the most important improvement in education over the past 30 years. Perhaps over the past 100 years.
QuoteNone of that is as important as not beating the students. Seriously. Most of us didn't grow up in an environment where we were beaten in class regularly by the teacher, principal, or by other students at the will of an adult. Making classroom beating illegal and enforcing it has been the most important improvement in education over the past 30 years. Perhaps over the past 100 years.Whatever your views on corporal punishment, you can hardly claim that the standard of education has gone up as a resilt of abolishing it. Literacy and numeracy rates in the UK have gone backwards according to some surveys. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449481/Education-crisis-Pupils-worse-maths-literacy-grandparents.htmlIt may be one of the most important developments in terms of allowing liberals to experience a warmer, fuzzier feeling that they are protecting the children better, but not much else.
Whatever your views on beating kids, you can hardly claim that the standard of education has gone up as a resilt of abolishing it. Literacy and numeracy rates in the UK have gone backwards according to some surveys. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449481/Education-crisis-Pupils-worse-maths-literacy-grandparents.htmlIt may be one of the most important developments in terms of giving liberals a warmer, fuzzier feeling that they are protecting the children better, but not much else. You happy now?
Research notes that corporal punishment constructs an environment of education that can be described as unproductive, nullifying, and punitive. Children become victims, and trepidation is introduced to all in such a classroom. There is a limited (if any) sense of confidence and security; even those children who witness this type of abuse are robbed of their full learning potential 43, 46, 66, 67, 68 and 70. Students who are witnesses or victims of such abuse can develop low self-esteem, magnified guilt feelings, and various anxiety symptoms; such results can have baneful results in the psychosocial and educational development of these students 46, 49, 60, 62, 66, 67 and 71. When studies look at the milieu of these classrooms, one finds that all are subjected to less, not more, learning. Because of fear, the nurturing of open communication, so vital to effective education, is severely spoiled in such aversive settings.
Sorry, I switched off when I saw the terms 'abuse' and 'low self esteem'.Not really inetrested in whether CP/beating is morally justified, just saying in my country abolishing it hasn't produced better results. Another statistic you could throw out would be 40% of UK teachers quitting before 5 years at least partly due to 'unruly pupils' according to this report. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/jan/15/ofsted-chief-teachers-quitting-scandalOf course there are other reasons too but all I'm saying is that I don't think abolishing CP/beating has had such a positive effect as to clearly place it in a list of the most important developments in education. If you speak to the average Korean teacher, for example, they would argue it is one of the most important developments in the last 30 years for negative reasons.
oh look, a discussion about corporal punishment. i'm so glad this has come up because it's not like it's been discussed 1,592 times on this site in the past, now has it?
Who is discussing corporal punishment?
Random, unprovoked beatings
QuoteRandom, unprovoked beatingsHaven't they always been illegal?