I use Firefox as my main browser, and I'm also having the same problem ~

Could you clear you browser's cache? close your browser, and then visit again?

I'm thinking your browser is using the old CSS.

Ah, working now (ugly brown theme and all). I don't know why since I didn't clear the cache or do anything.

Actually, if it were just a HTML issue, then it's no biggie, but the templating scheme I created got garbled because of multiple edits using the software's own editing tools (so stupid if you ask me).  What's worse is that I didn't make a backup of the template I created, so I'm going to have to make a new one, meaning you guys will have to live with the ugly colours for a bit.

But c'mon.... 50 most recent topics    You got to give me that.

I like the current way better. I don't care much for the yellow/brownish color, but it is a lot easier to use and I can scroll through the updates. Maybe less snazzy, but a lot cleaner and professional, I'd say! 

My vote:  Change the color (if you can) but keep the style!

To be fair, the current (blue 'n' brown dirt) template is good in my mind apart from the colours. Thinking for a moment, the brown could easily be replaced with photos filtered down to a greyscale-alike palette between navy blue and pale blue (or black to navy blue) which'd finally put all those header pics amassed to use. Naturally, the text colours would have to be changed to match such a scheme (white or black depending on luminosity differences), but I think the present template has the proportions perfect.

Mockup image to demonstrate attached. Image is one of mine of Daejeon. It doesn't reduce in colours well (its an autumn shot) but its all I had access to.

Hey Paul,

That actually looks rather nice!  Although the issue with larger images loading on average of 80k to 100k times a day is the amount of extra bandwidth it consumes.  That was the issue with one of the very first templates (although not the same level of traffic).

I can implement something along those lines, but I need to make upgrades to the service purchased by the site.

Believe it or not, we have nearly 2TB of bandwidth allotted per month, and we always reach near the limit, with a few times actually having gone over it.  So an extra 50Kb image (it would likely end up being bigger, but I'm being conservative) times 100,000, times 30 = 150  GB of bandwidth.  Crazy stuff!

We can do it though, just not massive images, cause the 150GB will turn into TBs.

I'm going to switch the colours a bit first, and get rid of the funky colours.    After having backed up the template! LOL. j/k.  The templates are a mixture of PHP and HTML, and of course CSS style sheets, but the main index of the other one just turned into a heap of trash.  I typically have no issues as I SSH into the server, and do my work that way, but SMF has implemented the worst possible solution for editing a template, and I had thought of just doing some quick edits....  Horrible.  Just horrible.

Can you take a look at how signatures are displayed?  Right now, all signatures show up off to the right of the post itself instead of under it. Thanks!

agreed, it's not major, but it's a bit confusing.

Why are people talking about photos or pictures in the header. I have never seen such things. Personally, I think that if it would use more bandwidth unneccessarily, rather skip it. I love this site!