For example, if you smack someone across the head, but there's no physical proof because there's no blood, can you still be charged with assault?
1. Drawing blood is by no means a necessary (though maybe sufficient) standard in determining whether someone has been assaulted. 2. The answer to the question could be yes, if the "smack" was a cause of injury of any sort; or the appearance of a probability of such (e.g., an indicator could be closed knuckle fisted vs. open handed).3. Are there reliable witnesses? Or video evidence?4. Exigential circumstances still apply: Who started the physical altercation? As a newspaper reporter i for years had to sit through court decisions in which ANY contact to the head was scrutinized. After years of examples, I have come to the thought that a guy could swing with all his might and strike a guy's arm and it matters not in a court of law unless there's evidence of broken bones, but any contact to the face or thereabouts is red flagging likely assault convictions (to wit, you gotta prove otherwise, it seems often).
Orca consume the great white dummy sharks in the ocean.Dolphins dance wildly and happily with people and their dogs in the sea (google it).Polar bears await seals to breathe at holes; as posters await their prey.It is the way of the wild.In a digital world, the impact is limited, though at times significant. (E.g., cancel culture couldn't survive w/o it).
How often can you miss the point?(I know, know... you are purposefully taking the piss.)So be it.
More of the deathly boring. You have no business being a moderator. This forum is not about your repetitive, insecure stories (you know that is true).
Ask CO2! He (apparently) "beat the snot" out of some old man and by all accounts got away with it scot free. So he beat someone up and none of the other Koreans in the vicinity called the police. Seems legit.Elsewhere on r/thathappened Waygook, we have another poster who (apparently) just shoulder barges innocent Koreans who dare not get out of her way.So the answer to op's question is...a lot!
I am absolutely convinced that VanIslander is a bot. Literally every single thing they post gives my an intense uncanny valley feeling. Reading his posts are like watching Mark Zuckerberg drink water. No human writes like that, so unnatural and stilted. One of the hardest things to get right with a chat AI is getting them to stay on topic and keep things relevant to the conversation. VanIslander just doesn't pass the Turing test.
If there were to be a moderator civil war, I'd be on Kyndo's side.
